Assess the Effectiveness of Type 2 and Type 3 Safety Vests for Day and Night Use
Work zones are an essential component of any state transportation agency's construction and maintenance operations. As such, agencies apply numerous practices in order to keep their workers safe during construction operations. These strategies typically fall under the following categories: work zone traffic control (e.g., arrow boards, variable message signs, drums, etc.), work zone operational strategies (e.g., reduced speed limits in work zones), and personal protective equipment for highway workers. With regard to the last category, workers are typically provided with varying combinations of helmets, reflective vests, reflective pants, etc. to wear while on the job site depending on the location of the job (e.g., freeway vs. local road) and other conditions (e.g., whether or not nighttime work will take place). The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) recently invested in several more advanced items to improve worker safety (and also traveler safety, by hopefully reducing the number of crashes overall). Specifically, ODOT invested in Type 2 and 3 safety vests, halo lights, and reflectors on the back of dump trucks. These materials were expected to provide the maximum safety effectiveness in terms of conspicuity of workers and work zone equipment. However, while these items separately are known to improve safety, there was concern that together they may not be as effective. This project sought to determine the effectiveness of each piece of safety equipment, collectively and individually, and determine if there are better methods for ensuring the safety of highway workers during both night and daytime operations. In order to accomplish this goal, the research team carried out several major tasks. First, they collected measurements of optical (material measurements under a selected region of the electromagnetic spectra) and photometric (luminous measurements under selected lighting environments) properties of various safety items (e.g., vests, lights, etc.) in order to prepare for simulation-based evaluation in the next step. The simulation-based evaluation used measurements from the first task to create realistic models of retroreflective vests, lights, and other safety equipment in virtual scenarios. These items were then placed in different virtual work zone environments, each of which had different conditions in terms of work zone set up, traffic control, vests worn by workers, time of day/ambient lighting, etc. Through an eye-tracking experiment measuring participants gaze on workers in different virtual work zone scenarios and a driving simulator experiment in which participants drove through virtual work zones and were asked follow up questions on worker conspicuity, subjective and objective measures of worker visibility were obtained. Conclusions from the simulation experiment (e.g., this type of vest made workers less visible at night, the presence of reflective tape had a negative effect on worker visibility in some cases, etc.) were then used to inform the development of work zone scenarios to test in a field experiment (a portion of the project that is not yet complete at the time of this draft report). Finally, results from each of the aforementioned steps were used to update a standard operations document on what types of safety equipment to use depending on specific work zone characteristics.