Opinion of Division III Student-athletes and Directors of Athletics Regarding the Deterrent Value of Institutional Drug-testing Programs
Abstract:The current study was designed to determine if differences in opinion existed among student-athletes (SAs) at five NCAA Division III (DIII) institutions with (n 250), and five institutions without (n = 235) a drug-testing program, regarding the deterrent value of institutional drug testing. The opinions of DIll Directors of Athletics (ADs; n = 10) were also examined. Differences were examined using the Student-Athlete Drug-Testing Questionnaire and the Athletic Director Drug-Testing Questionnaire, and analyzed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. SAs and ADs were surveyed about: (a) institutional testing, (b) current NCAA DIII Championship testing, and (c) hypothetical NCAA DIII year-round testing. ADs responded similarly to questions about the three testing programs. SAs responded similarly to questions about the deterrent value (personally) of the three testing programs, while drug-testing SAs responded significantly higher than non drug-testing SAs when asked about their peers. Practical support was found for the use of drug testing as a deterrent to steroid use. As ADs and the NCAA consider increased drug testing in DIII, more research is needed to evaluate the strength of testing as a deterrent.