Bosnian: Authentication of Hadith: Redefining the Criteria ‎

In today’s complex and volatile world, the consequences of relying on fraudulent and counterfeit ‎Hadith to legitimize extremist behavior, issue violent fatwas, and justify blatant abuse, particularly ‎of women, is not only far too easy but in fact dangerous. Israr Khan addresses the sensitive topic of ‎Hadith authentication, focusing on the criteria adopted by classical scholars to maintain that ‎concentration on the continuity and accuracy of the chain of narrators, rather than the textual ‎content of Hadith, has led to particular Hadith being included which either contradict other Hadith ‎directly, project the Prophet (SAAS) in an uncharacteristic light, or do not reflect and/or conflict ‎with the teachings of the Qur’an. The study traces in careful detail the historical development of the ‎oral and written traditions, as well as the many targeted attempts at fabrication that took place, ‎critiquing in methodical detail certain Hadith which have come to be widely accepted as ‎‎“authentic.” The prominent collections we have today, were made possible by the development of ‎the science of Hadith criticism, and Muslim scholars deserve deep appreciation for their painstaking ‎work, as well as their invaluable contribution towards preserving the Hadith literature to the best of ‎their ability. However, insists the author, the process is ongoing, and the closed-door policy which ‎currently surrounds Hadith authentication needs to be carefully reexamined.‎